Appendix¶
Comparison of Nomogram to Computer Application¶
Characteristic |
Computer |
Nomogram |
---|---|---|
Hardware Requirements |
Computer, specialized calculator, or smartphone |
Any straightedge, pencil |
Software Requirements |
Application encapsulating the relevant relationships |
Graphical representation of the relevant relationships |
Infrastructure Requirements |
Computing resources, perhaps Internet access; if smartphone, appropriate app |
Ambient light |
Energy Needs |
Electrical outlet or batteries |
Ambient light |
Learning Curve |
Knowing what to punch in, plus learning curve for software, hardware, and infrastructure |
Knowing how to connect two points, and how to interpolate a point on a scale |
Documentation |
What documentation? Where? |
Self-documenting |
Tool Distribution |
Likely Internet access |
Single sheet of paper |
Results Distribution |
Need printer or Internet connection |
Hand-carry or fax document |
Cost |
Variable |
Cost of duplicating and transmitting a single page |
Accuracy (decimal places) |
As many as you want… if the software provides them |
As many as you need… given the precision of the input |
Speed: As fast as… |
…your hardware |
…you can draw a straight line |
Sensitivity Analysis |
Repeated data sets |
Examination of graphic |
Implicit Solution |
Usually difficult or impossible |
Automatic |
Common Failure Mode |
Punch in wrong numbers |
Can’t find glasses |
Need to Calculate |
None |
None |
Third World Use |
Problematic depending on computing accessibility |
Works so long as pencil and paper are available |
GIGO Susceptibility |
High; May be hard to detect |
Garbage In is clearly documented |
Permanence |
Need a printer |
Creates a written record as part of usage pattern |
Trust Factor |
Did the programmer get it right? |
Did the nomographer get it right? |
Communication |
Single number output |
Graphical interactivity |
Pizzazz Factor |
High: Very modern |
Low: Old-fashioned slide-rule-like technology |